Arbitrability of disputes relating to oppression and mismanagement

By:

RAO, V DURGA

Material type:

Mixed materialsPublication details: 2012Description: 1093-1099Subject(s):

NLM classification:

In: CHARTERED SECRETARYMSummary: Nothing prevents the shareholders to get their disputes with the majority settled through arbitration mechanism, but the arbitrator deciding such a dispute can not be seen as a presiding officer exercising power under section 397/398 and the finalorder of the arbitrator can not be equated with a finding of CLB in an application under sction 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The shareholders defending the petition under section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 can prefer an application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1956

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Vol info	Status	Date due	Barcode
Periodicals/Magazines	SSCBS Library		42/9	Available		P14513

Nothing prevents the shareholders to get their disputes with the majority settled through arbitration mechanism, but the arbitrator deciding such a dispute can not be seen as a presiding officer exercising power under section 397/398 and the finalorder of the arbitrator can not be equated with a finding of CLB in an application under sction 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The shareholders defending the petition under section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 can prefer an application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1956

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.