000 | 01002npc a2200169Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 140613s2012 xx 000 0 und d | ||
060 | _a658 | ||
100 | _aRAO, V DURGA | ||
245 | _aArbitrability of disputes relating to oppression and mismanagement | ||
260 | _c2012 | ||
300 | _a1093-1099 | ||
520 | _aNothing prevents the shareholders to get their disputes with the majority settled through arbitration mechanism, but the arbitrator deciding such a dispute can not be seen as a presiding officer exercising power under section 397/398 and the finalorder of the arbitrator can not be equated with a finding of CLB in an application under sction 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The shareholders defending the petition under section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 can prefer an application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1956 | ||
653 | _aDISPUTES | ||
653 | _aMISMANAGEMENT | ||
773 |
_oP14513 _nM _921882 _011164 _tCHARTERED SECRETARY |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cARTCL |
||
999 |
_c11404 _d11404 |